Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCCX vs FSMDX
FMCCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FMCCX vs FSMDX
FMCCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCCX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. FMCCX (2.72B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FMCCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs FMCCX (0.62). FMCCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FMCCX (31 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). FMCCX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FMCCX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.68 vs. FMCCX (17.17). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. FMCCX (15.75).
| FMCCX | FSMDX | FMCCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.03 | 2,880% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.03 | 2,880% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.141 | 18.034 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 52.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.76 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.17 | 19.68 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.48 | 63.29 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.75 | 43.15 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.79 | 170.33 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement