Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCKX vs RNWBX
FMCKX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FMCKX vs RNWBX
FMCKX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCKX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCKX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. FMCKX (13.7B). FMCKX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FMCKX (0.55) vs RNWBX (0.41). FMCKX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FMCKX (22 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). FMCKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). FMCKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). FMCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FMCKX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FMCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 65.36 vs. RNWBX (28.07). FMCKX return over 5 years is better than : 42.44 vs. RNWBX (14.29).
| FMCKX | RNWBX | FMCKX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.66 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.66 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.520 | 16.252 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 85.6B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.41 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 65.36 | 28.07 | 233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.70 | 51.49 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.44 | 14.29 | 297% |
| Returns for 10 years | 161.10 | 111.19 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement