Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCKX vs RNWEX
FMCKX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts FMCKX vs RNWEX
FMCKX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCKX vs. RNWEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCKX is a Buy and RNWEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FMCKX (13.7B). RNWEX pays higher dividends than FMCKX: RNWEX (0.97) vs FMCKX (0.55). FMCKX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: FMCKX (22 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). FMCKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RNWEX (0.92). FMCKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWEX (46.00). FMCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWEX: FMCKX (0) vs RNWEX (250). FMCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.12 vs. RNWEX (30.94). FMCKX return over 5 years is better than : 45.85 vs. RNWEX (19.38).
| FMCKX | RNWEX | FMCKX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.92 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.92 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.849 | 18.630 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 90.9B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.97 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.12 | 30.94 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.70 | 56.51 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.85 | 19.38 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.29 | 131.82 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers