Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCKX vs RNWFX
FMCKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FMCKX vs RNWFX
FMCKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCKX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FMCKX (13.9B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FMCKX: RNWFX (1.19) vs FMCKX (0.55). FMCKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FMCKX (22 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FMCKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FMCKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). FMCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FMCKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FMCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.44 vs. RNWFX (19.68). FMCKX return over 5 years is better than : 41.12 vs. RNWFX (14.77).
| FMCKX | RNWFX | FMCKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.537 | 12.700 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 90.7B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.19 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.44 | 19.68 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.05 | 44.28 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.12 | 14.77 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.14 | 110.07 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers