Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCKX vs RNWFX
FMCKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FMCKX vs RNWFX
FMCKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCKX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FMCKX (13.7B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FMCKX: RNWFX (1.20) vs FMCKX (0.55). FMCKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FMCKX (22 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FMCKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FMCKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). FMCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FMCKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FMCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.12 vs. RNWFX (31.39). FMCKX return over 5 years is better than : 45.85 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| FMCKX | RNWFX | FMCKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.849 | 18.794 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 90.9B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.20 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.12 | 31.39 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.70 | 58.06 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.85 | 20.98 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.29 | 135.60 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement