Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCKX vs RNWHX
FMCKX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FMCKX vs RNWHX
FMCKX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCKX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCKX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FMCKX (13.9B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FMCKX: RNWHX (1.14) vs FMCKX (0.55). FMCKX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FMCKX (22 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FMCKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FMCKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FMCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FMCKX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FMCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.44 vs. RNWHX (19.47). FMCKX return over 5 years is better than : 41.12 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| FMCKX | RNWHX | FMCKX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.72 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.72 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.537 | 12.651 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 90.7B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.14 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.44 | 19.47 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.05 | 43.67 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.12 | 14.04 | 293% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.14 | 107.31 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers