Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCLX vs VIMSX
FMCLX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FMCLX vs VIMSX
Federated Hermes Mid-Cap Index R6
Price$16.05
Change-$0.10 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.21M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$78.96
Change-$0.57 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.16B
FMCLX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCLX vs. VIMSX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCLX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. FMCLX (289M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FMCLX: VIMSX (1.35) vs FMCLX (1.12). FMCLX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FMCLX (9 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FMCLX (0.46) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FMCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FMCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FMCLX (0) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. FMCLX (-6.10). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 70.08 vs. FMCLX (-2.34).
| FMCLX | VIMSX | FMCLX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.17 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.17 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.504 | 10.415 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 289M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.35 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.10 | 11.43 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.71 | 54.86 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.34 | 70.08 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 159.23 | - |