Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCMX vs GFAFX
FMCMX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FMCMX vs GFAFX
FMCMX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMCMX (97.1B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FMCMX: GFAFX (0.20) vs FMCMX (0.00). FMCMX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FMCMX (6 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FMCMX (0.38). FMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). FMCMX (250) and GFAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. FMCMX (5.94). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.91 vs. FMCMX (7.88).
| FMCMX | GFAFX | FMCMX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.65 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.65 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.220 | 8.691 | -37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.1B | 361B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.94 | 12.03 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.92 | 48.36 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.88 | 18.91 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 117.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers