Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCMX vs RGACX
FMCMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMCMX vs RGACX
FMCMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FMCMX (93.1B). FMCMX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FMCMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMCMX (6 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMCMX (0.38). FMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FMCMX (250) and RGACX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. FMCMX (1.66). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.75 vs. FMCMX (6.78).
| FMCMX | RGACX | FMCMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.93 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.93 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.800 | 9.193 | -9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.1B | 342B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.66 | 4.90 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.03 | 44.95 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.78 | 14.75 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement