Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCMX vs RGACX
FMCMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMCMX vs RGACX
FMCMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FMCMX (93.8B). FMCMX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FMCMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMCMX (6 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMCMX (0.38). FMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FMCMX (250) and RGACX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.40 vs. FMCMX (11.93). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.76 vs. FMCMX (16.36).
| FMCMX | RGACX | FMCMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.93 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.93 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.440 | 9.929 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.8B | 338B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.93 | 13.40 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.52 | 50.58 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.36 | 20.76 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement