Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCMX vs RGAEX
FMCMX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts FMCMX vs RGAEX
FMCMX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCMX vs. RGAEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCMX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FMCMX (94.5B). RGAEX pays higher dividends than FMCMX: RGAEX (0.21) vs FMCMX (0.00). FMCMX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: FMCMX (6 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). RGAEX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FMCMX (0.38). FMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGAEX (32.00). FMCMX (250) and RGAEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.00 vs. FMCMX (-4.03). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 12.98 vs. FMCMX (2.66).
| FMCMX | RGAEX | FMCMX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.63 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.63 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.183 | 9.051 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.5B | 353B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.03 | -0.00 | 895,753% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.01 | 42.68 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.66 | 12.98 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement