Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCMX vs RGAFX
FMCMX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FMCMX vs RGAFX
FMCMX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMCMX (97.1B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FMCMX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FMCMX (0.00). FMCMX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FMCMX (6 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FMCMX (0.38) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). FMCMX (250) and RGAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.49 vs. FMCMX (5.94). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.71 vs. FMCMX (7.88).
| FMCMX | RGAFX | FMCMX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.34 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.34 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.220 | 8.854 | -36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.1B | 361B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.94 | 12.49 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.92 | 50.06 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.88 | 20.71 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 121.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement