Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCVX vs SSGSX
FMCVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FMCVX vs SSGSX
Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val R6
Price$26.55
Change-$0.06 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.01M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
FMCVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. FMCVX (211M). FMCVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FMCVX (0.75) vs SSGSX (0.50). FMCVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FMCVX (12 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FMCVX (0.96). FMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.90 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMCVX: SSGSX (2500) vs FMCVX (1000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.93 vs. FMCVX (-13.31). FMCVX return over 5 years is better than : 22.60 vs. SSGSX (20.68).
| FMCVX | SSGSX | FMCVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.26 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.26 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.228 | 1.852 | 336% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 5.63B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.50 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.31 | -3.93 | 339% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.08 | -0.85 | 482% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.60 | 20.68 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.51 | 24.03 | -77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement