Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCVX vs SSGSX
FMCVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FMCVX vs SSGSX
FMCVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.1B vs. FMCVX (224M). FMCVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FMCVX (0.56) vs SSGSX (0.52). FMCVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FMCVX (13 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FMCVX (0.93). FMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.36 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMCVX: SSGSX (2500) vs FMCVX (1000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.91 vs. FMCVX (-2.09). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.55 vs. FMCVX (-17.47).
| FMCVX | SSGSX | FMCVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.23 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.784 | 15.641 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 4.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.52 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.09 | 8.91 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.07 | 12.96 | -31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.47 | -2.55 | 685% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.30 | 35.89 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement