Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCX vs RECS
FMCX vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FMCX vs RECS
FMCX vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCX vs. RECS commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCX is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.8B vs. FMCX (120M). FMCX has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: FMCX (8.150) vs RECS (6.489). FMCX was incepted earlier than RECS: FMCX (4 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FMCX (0.71). FMCX has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| FMCX | RECS | FMCX / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.150 | 6.489 | 126% |
| Net Assets | 120M | 5.8B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.15 | 473% |
| Turnover | 67.00 | 32.00 | 209% |
| Yield | 0.29 | 0.75 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FMCX | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 63% | 11 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FMCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCX has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCX jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMCX | 100% | N/A | ||
| BN - FMCX | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| BAM - FMCX | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ENTG - FMCX | 61% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GGG - FMCX | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| NICE - FMCX | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.55% | ||
More | ||||