Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs HWGAX
FMDRX vs HWGAX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs HWGAX
FMDRX vs HWGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. HWGAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Buy and HWGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.2B vs. HWGAX (36.9M). FMDRX pays higher dividends than HWGAX: FMDRX (1.83) vs HWGAX (1.22). FMDRX was incepted earlier than HWGAX: FMDRX (13 years) vs HWGAX (13 years). HWGAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.89). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FMDRX (42.28). HWGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: HWGAX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.52 vs. HWGAX (0.12). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.66 vs. FMDRX (7.95).
| FMDRX | HWGAX | FMDRX / HWGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.95 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.34 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.712 | -0.445 | -834% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.2B | 36.9M | 24,932% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.22 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.52 | 0.12 | 3,059% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.47 | 11.48 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.95 | 14.66 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.23 | 63.71 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement