Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs HWGAX
FMDRX vs HWGAX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs HWGAX
FMDRX vs HWGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. HWGAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and HWGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.28B vs. HWGAX (42.3M). FMDRX pays higher dividends than HWGAX: FMDRX (1.71) vs HWGAX (1.13). FMDRX was incepted earlier than HWGAX: FMDRX (13 years) vs HWGAX (13 years). HWGAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.89). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMDRX (42.28). HWGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: HWGAX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.41 vs. HWGAX (-0.34). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.90 vs. FMDRX (11.47).
| FMDRX | HWGAX | FMDRX / HWGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.95 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.34 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.706 | 4.106 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | 42.3M | 21,929% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.13 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.41 | -0.34 | -713% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.27 | 15.00 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.47 | 19.90 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.88 | 65.60 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement