Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs LZFIX
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs LZFIX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$33.73
Change-$0.12 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.53B
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$8.83
Change-$0.03 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.94M
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. LZFIX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and LZFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.53B vs. LZFIX (46.9M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than FMDRX: LZFIX (2.19) vs FMDRX (1.87). FMDRX was incepted earlier than LZFIX: FMDRX (12 years) vs LZFIX (8 years). LZFIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FMDRX (34.55). LZFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: LZFIX (10000) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. LZFIX (-12.14). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 40.64 vs. LZFIX (7.99).
| FMDRX | LZFIX | FMDRX / LZFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.985 | 6.393 | 281% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.53B | 46.9M | 20,322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 2.19 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.13 | -12.14 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.46 | 4.61 | 768% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.64 | 7.99 | 509% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers