Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs LZFIX
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs LZFIX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$32.70
Change-$0.16 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$7.78
Change-$0.08 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.07M
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. LZFIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and LZFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. LZFIX (41.1M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than FMDRX: LZFIX (2.27) vs FMDRX (1.79). FMDRX was incepted earlier than LZFIX: FMDRX (13 years) vs LZFIX (8 years). LZFIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FMDRX (34.55). LZFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: LZFIX (10000) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.31 vs. LZFIX (-19.83). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 26.65 vs. LZFIX (-13.30).
| FMDRX | LZFIX | FMDRX / LZFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.535 | -6.576 | -221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.13B | 41.1M | 22,224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 2.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | -19.83 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.02 | -18.74 | -91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.65 | -13.30 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement