Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs LZFIX
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs LZFIX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$32.14
Change+$0.24 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$9.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.12M
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. LZFIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Buy and LZFIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. LZFIX (47.1M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than FMDRX: LZFIX (2.13) vs FMDRX (2.00). FMDRX was incepted earlier than LZFIX: FMDRX (12 years) vs LZFIX (8 years). LZFIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FMDRX (34.55). LZFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: LZFIX (10000) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.00 vs. LZFIX (-0.34). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 28.92 vs. LZFIX (15.01).
| FMDRX | LZFIX | FMDRX / LZFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.189 | 13.565 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.13B | 47.1M | 19,391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 2.13 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.00 | -0.34 | -596% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.60 | -9.26 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.92 | 15.01 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers