Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs LZFIX
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs LZFIX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$32.51
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.21B
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$9.50
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.97M
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. LZFIX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and LZFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.21B vs. LZFIX (47M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than FMDRX: LZFIX (2.09) vs FMDRX (1.94). FMDRX was incepted earlier than LZFIX: FMDRX (12 years) vs LZFIX (8 years). LZFIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FMDRX (34.55). LZFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: LZFIX (10000) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.23 vs. LZFIX (-2.71). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.88 vs. LZFIX (21.94).
| FMDRX | LZFIX | FMDRX / LZFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.350 | 14.166 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.21B | 47M | 19,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 2.09 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.23 | -2.71 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.12 | -0.69 | -2,781% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.88 | 21.94 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers