Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs LZFIX
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs LZFIX
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. LZFIX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and LZFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.28B vs. LZFIX (41M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than FMDRX: LZFIX (5.96) vs FMDRX (1.71). FMDRX was incepted earlier than LZFIX: FMDRX (13 years) vs LZFIX (9 years). LZFIX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.89). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FMDRX (42.28). LZFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: LZFIX (10000) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.41 vs. LZFIX (-9.74). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 11.47 vs. LZFIX (-26.40).
| FMDRX | LZFIX | FMDRX / LZFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.95 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.06 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.706 | 4.722 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | 41M | 22,624% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 5.96 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.41 | -9.74 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.27 | -15.93 | -115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.47 | -26.40 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers