Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs LZFIX
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs LZFIX
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. LZFIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and LZFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 8.98B vs. LZFIX (35.9M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than FMDRX: LZFIX (6.52) vs FMDRX (1.82). FMDRX was incepted earlier than LZFIX: FMDRX (13 years) vs LZFIX (9 years). LZFIX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.89). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FMDRX (42.28). LZFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: LZFIX (10000) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.31 vs. LZFIX (-24.30). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 5.43 vs. LZFIX (-36.56).
| FMDRX | LZFIX | FMDRX / LZFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.95 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.06 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.561 | -8.056 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.98B | 35.9M | 25,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 6.52 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | -24.30 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.38 | -26.84 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.43 | -36.56 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers