Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs SFGCX
FMDRX vs SFGCX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs SFGCX
FMDRX vs SFGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. SFGCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and SFGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX pays higher dividends than SFGCX: FMDRX (1.71) vs SFGCX (1.17). FMDRX was incepted earlier than SFGCX: FMDRX (13 years) vs SFGCX (28 years). SFGCX (2.37) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.89). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. FMDRX (42.28). SFGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: SFGCX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.41 vs. SFGCX (1.99). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 11.47 vs. SFGCX (-3.35).
| FMDRX | SFGCX | FMDRX / SFGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.92 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.37 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.706 | 13.465 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | N/A | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.17 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.41 | 1.99 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.27 | 31.04 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.47 | -3.35 | -342% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.88 | 45.43 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement