Investors comparing technology-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs) often evaluate Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) for their distinct approaches to sector exposure. FMET delivers targeted access to metaverse-enabling companies, while XLK tracks a broad U.S. technology benchmark. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as alternatives within the technology space, appealing to investors balancing thematic innovation against established sector leadership. The comparison highlights differences in strategy, costs, and positioning relevant to current market cycles driven by artificial intelligence and digital transformation trends.
Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) is a passively managed thematic ETF that seeks to track the performance of the Fidelity Metaverse Index before fees and expenses. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in securities included in the index, which focuses on global companies developing, manufacturing, distributing, or selling products or services related to the metaverse. It typically holds 53 to 64 securities, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 48-49% of assets. Notable top holdings include NVIDIA Corp, Adobe Inc, Microsoft Corp, Meta Platforms Inc, and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Sector allocations concentrate in technology (around 58%), communication services (around 34%), and real estate (around 8%). The expense ratio stands at 0.39%. FMET employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment.
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) is a passively managed ETF designed to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index before expenses. The fund holds approximately 73 securities from the technology sector of the S&P 500. Top holdings feature significant positions in NVIDIA Corp, Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Broadcom Inc, and Micron Technology Inc, with the top 10 typically representing over 60% of assets. Sector exposure centers overwhelmingly on technology (over 99%), with minor allocation to communication services. The expense ratio is 0.08%. XLK uses a market-capitalization-weighted approach with quarterly rebalancing to reflect index changes, emphasizing liquidity and broad representation of large-cap technology companies.
The technology sector continues to benefit from sustained capital flows into artificial intelligence infrastructure, semiconductor advancements, and digital platforms. Macroeconomic drivers include expectations around interest rate paths and corporate spending on cloud computing and data centers. Regulatory developments in antitrust and data privacy remain key considerations for major technology firms. Both ETFs face risks from valuation pressures in high-growth names, supply chain disruptions, and shifts in consumer adoption of emerging technologies. The broader environment favors companies positioned in semiconductors, software, and connectivity, supporting sector rotation toward established leaders alongside selective interest in thematic opportunities.
In recent market cycles, XLK has demonstrated consistent participation in technology sector gains driven by earnings strength among its mega-cap holdings. FMET has shown more variable behavior tied to sentiment around metaverse adoption and related innovations. Relative positioning highlights XLK’s lower volatility profile stemming from greater diversification within the technology sector, while FMET exhibits higher sensitivity to thematic catalysts. Both ETFs have responded to broader equity trends and earnings cycles, with XLK benefiting from its scale and liquidity during periods of sector rotation.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore additional insights.
Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification within technology, higher liquidity, and established sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probabilistic favorability to Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) for most investors seeking core technology exposure, while recognizing Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) for those prioritizing thematic metaverse opportunities.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| FMET | XLK | FMET / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 3.415 | 33.790 | 10% |
| Net Assets | 44.5M | 125B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.08 | 488% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 5.00 | 600% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 0.40 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 28 years | - |
| FMET | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMET has been closely correlated with AMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMET jumps, then AMD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMET | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| AMD - FMET | 68% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| MPWR - FMET | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| NVDA - FMET | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| GDS - FMET | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| SMCI - FMET | 59% Loosely correlated | +15.66% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.