Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMFAX vs PGNAX
FMFAX vs PGNAX Comparison
Open Charts FMFAX vs PGNAX
FMFAX vs PGNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMFAX vs. PGNAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMFAX is a Hold and PGNAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGNAX has more cash in the bank: 899M vs. FMFAX (785M). FMFAX pays higher dividends than PGNAX: FMFAX (1.08) vs PGNAX (0.85). FMFAX was incepted earlier than PGNAX: FMFAX (20 years) vs PGNAX (36 years). PGNAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FMFAX (0.99). PGNAX (57.00) and FMFAX (56.00) have comparable annual turnover. FMFAX (6%) and PGNAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FMFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGNAX: FMFAX (250) vs PGNAX (1000). PGNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.86 vs. FMFAX (8.33). PGNAX return over 5 years is better than : 98.76 vs. FMFAX (5.56).
| FMFAX | PGNAX | FMFAX / PGNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.347 | 12.178 | 60% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 785M | 899M | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.85 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.33 | 38.86 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.68 | 52.73 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.56 | 98.76 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.36 | 145.92 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement