Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMFAX vs PGNAX
FMFAX vs PGNAX Comparison
Open Charts FMFAX vs PGNAX
FMFAX vs PGNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMFAX vs. PGNAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMFAX is a Hold and PGNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGNAX has more cash in the bank: 976M vs. FMFAX (791M). FMFAX pays higher dividends than PGNAX: FMFAX (1.05) vs PGNAX (0.76). FMFAX was incepted earlier than PGNAX: FMFAX (20 years) vs PGNAX (37 years). PGNAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FMFAX (0.99). PGNAX (57.00) and FMFAX (56.00) have comparable annual turnover. FMFAX (6%) and PGNAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FMFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGNAX: FMFAX (250) vs PGNAX (1000). PGNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.65 vs. FMFAX (6.21). PGNAX return over 5 years is better than : 126.71 vs. FMFAX (4.97).
| FMFAX | PGNAX | FMFAX / PGNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.853 | 25.473 | 35% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 791M | 976M | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.76 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.21 | 44.65 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.09 | 64.00 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.97 | 126.71 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.96 | 183.74 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement