Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMFMX vs RGABX
FMFMX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts FMFMX vs RGABX
FMFMX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMFMX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMFMX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FMFMX (1.55B). FMFMX pays higher dividends than RGABX: FMFMX (0.70) vs RGABX (0.00). FMFMX was incepted earlier than RGABX: FMFMX (12 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FMFMX (0.00). FMFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). FMFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: FMFMX (0) vs RGABX (250). FMFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.16 vs. RGABX (-3.09). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 5.04 vs. FMFMX (-2.58).
| FMFMX | RGABX | FMFMX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.812 | 8.220 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | -3.09 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.33 | 37.25 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.58 | 5.04 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.91 | 84.67 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement