Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMFMX vs RGABX
FMFMX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts FMFMX vs RGABX
FMFMX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMFMX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMFMX is a Hold and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FMFMX (1.48B). FMFMX pays higher dividends than RGABX: FMFMX (0.73) vs RGABX (0.00). FMFMX was incepted earlier than RGABX: FMFMX (12 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FMFMX (0.00). FMFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). FMFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: FMFMX (0) vs RGABX (250). FMFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.19 vs. RGABX (1.51). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 5.20 vs. FMFMX (-5.22).
| FMFMX | RGABX | FMFMX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.812 | 9.057 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 342B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.19 | 1.51 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.51 | 35.77 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.22 | 5.20 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.15 | 83.69 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers