Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMFMX vs RGABX
FMFMX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts FMFMX vs RGABX
FMFMX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMFMX vs. RGABX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMFMX is a Buy and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FMFMX (1.54B). FMFMX pays higher dividends than RGABX: FMFMX (0.69) vs RGABX (0.00). FMFMX was incepted earlier than RGABX: FMFMX (12 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FMFMX (0.00). FMFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). FMFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: FMFMX (0) vs RGABX (250). FMFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.82 vs. RGABX (-0.42). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 6.18 vs. FMFMX (-2.94).
| FMFMX | RGABX | FMFMX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.250 | 4.898 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.82 | -0.42 | -197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.09 | 30.62 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.94 | 6.18 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.62 | 79.82 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers