Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMFMX vs RGACX
FMFMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMFMX vs RGACX
Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Gr
Price$18.25
Change+$0.41 (+2.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.96
Change+$1.64 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.36B
FMFMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMFMX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMFMX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FMFMX (1.44B). FMFMX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FMFMX (0.48) vs RGACX (0.07). FMFMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMFMX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FMFMX (0.01). FMFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FMFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FMFMX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.09 vs. FMFMX (-11.44). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.25 vs. FMFMX (-3.62).
| FMFMX | RGACX | FMFMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.94 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.94 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.131 | 18.016 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.07 | 694% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.44 | 11.09 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.42 | 78.17 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.62 | 37.25 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.40 | 96.66 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement