Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMFMX vs RGACX
FMFMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMFMX vs RGACX
FMFMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMFMX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMFMX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMFMX (1.61B). FMFMX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FMFMX (0.69) vs RGACX (0.00). FMFMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMFMX (12 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMFMX (0.00). FMFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FMFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FMFMX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.46 vs. FMFMX (5.93). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 15.43 vs. FMFMX (-0.39).
| FMFMX | RGACX | FMFMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.750 | 6.146 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.93 | 7.46 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.79 | 43.37 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.39 | 15.43 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.53 | 102.78 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers