Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMGKX vs RGACX
FMGKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMGKX vs RGACX
FMGKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMGKX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMGKX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FMGKX (37.8B). FMGKX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FMGKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMGKX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMGKX (0.57). FMGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FMGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FMGKX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.13 vs. FMGKX (-4.51). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 8.33 vs. FMGKX (5.89).
| FMGKX | RGACX | FMGKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.93 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.93 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.007 | 3.589 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.8B | 357B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.51 | -1.13 | 398% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.86 | 32.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.89 | 8.33 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.76 | 91.18 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement