Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMGKX vs RGACX
FMGKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMGKX vs RGACX
FMGKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMGKX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMGKX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FMGKX (36.5B). FMGKX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FMGKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMGKX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMGKX (0.57). FMGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FMGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FMGKX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.84 vs. FMGKX (-3.61). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.87 vs. FMGKX (1.97).
| FMGKX | RGACX | FMGKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.93 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.93 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.806 | 10.084 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 342B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.61 | 3.84 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.49 | 41.49 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.97 | 10.87 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.37 | 99.47 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement