Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMGKX vs RGAFX
FMGKX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FMGKX vs RGAFX
FMGKX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMGKX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMGKX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMGKX (37.9B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FMGKX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FMGKX (0.00). FMGKX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FMGKX (18 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FMGKX (0.57) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FMGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). FMGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FMGKX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.90 vs. FMGKX (1.98). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.84 vs. FMGKX (16.42).
| FMGKX | RGAFX | FMGKX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.34 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.34 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.211 | 6.727 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.9B | 361B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.98 | 8.90 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.67 | 46.22 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.42 | 19.84 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.04 | 112.44 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers