Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMGKX vs RGAGX
FMGKX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FMGKX vs RGAGX
FMGKX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMGKX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMGKX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMGKX (37.8B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FMGKX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FMGKX (0.00). FMGKX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FMGKX (18 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FMGKX (0.57) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FMGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FMGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FMGKX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. FMGKX (-0.52). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.64 vs. FMGKX (10.64).
| FMGKX | RGAGX | FMGKX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.29 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.29 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.144 | 8.055 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.8B | 361B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.52 | 6.50 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.59 | 45.31 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.64 | 17.64 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.29 | 114.06 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement