Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMKFX vs RGACX
FMKFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMKFX vs RGACX
FMKFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMKFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMKFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FMKFX (332M). FMKFX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FMKFX (0.11) vs RGACX (0.00). FMKFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMKFX (7 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMKFX (0.45). FMKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FMKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FMKFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. FMKFX (1.30). FMKFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.51 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| FMKFX | RGACX | FMKFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.93 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.93 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.062 | 6.959 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.30 | 3.68 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.48 | 37.13 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.51 | 13.46 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement