Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMKFX vs RGACX
FMKFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMKFX vs RGACX
FMKFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMKFX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMKFX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FMKFX (321M). FMKFX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FMKFX (0.11) vs RGACX (0.00). FMKFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMKFX (7 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMKFX (0.45). FMKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FMKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FMKFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. FMKFX (-3.27). FMKFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.25 vs. RGACX (10.91).
| FMKFX | RGACX | FMKFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.93 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.93 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.938 | 5.397 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 321M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.27 | 0.93 | -353% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.90 | 33.65 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.25 | 10.91 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers