Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMKFX vs RGACX
FMKFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMKFX vs RGACX
FMKFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMKFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMKFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMKFX (333M). FMKFX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FMKFX (0.11) vs RGACX (0.00). FMKFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMKFX (7 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMKFX (0.45). FMKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FMKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FMKFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. FMKFX (6.86). FMKFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.03 vs. RGACX (13.23).
| FMKFX | RGACX | FMKFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.93 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.93 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.556 | 6.185 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 333M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 7.94 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.21 | 43.05 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.03 | 13.23 | 295% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement