Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMKFX vs RGAGX
FMKFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FMKFX vs RGAGX
FMKFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMKFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMKFX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMKFX (333M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FMKFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FMKFX (0.11). FMKFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FMKFX (7 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FMKFX (0.45) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FMKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FMKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FMKFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. FMKFX (6.86). FMKFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.03 vs. RGAGX (20.99).
| FMKFX | RGAGX | FMKFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.29 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.29 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.556 | 8.887 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 333M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.51 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 12.55 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.21 | 50.34 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.03 | 20.99 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement