Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMKFX vs RGEBX
FMKFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FMKFX vs RGEBX
FMKFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMKFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMKFX is a Buy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FMKFX (321M). FMKFX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FMKFX (0.11) vs RGEBX (0.00). FMKFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FMKFX (7 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FMKFX (0.45). FMKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FMKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FMKFX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.66 vs. FMKFX (-3.27). FMKFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.25 vs. RGEBX (9.78).
| FMKFX | RGEBX | FMKFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.08 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.08 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.938 | 5.309 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 321M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.27 | 0.66 | -496% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.90 | 32.78 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.25 | 9.78 | 289% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers