Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMMFX vs RGVBX
FMMFX vs RGVBX Comparison
Open Charts FMMFX vs RGVBX
FMMFX vs RGVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMMFX vs. RGVBX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMMFX is a Hold and RGVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVBX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. FMMFX (12.9B). FMMFX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: FMMFX (4.49) vs RGVBX (3.31). FMMFX was incepted earlier than RGVBX: FMMFX (6 years) vs RGVBX (24 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FMMFX (0.31). FMMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVBX (50.00). FMMFX (250) and RGVBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FMMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.27 vs. RGVBX (-1.42). FMMFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.44 vs. RGVBX (-6.33).
| FMMFX | RGVBX | FMMFX / RGVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.32 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.32 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.231 | -2.157 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 24B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.49 | 3.31 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | -1.42 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.72 | 8.73 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.44 | -6.33 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers