Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMMFX vs RGVBX
FMMFX vs RGVBX Comparison
Open Charts FMMFX vs RGVBX
FMMFX vs RGVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVBX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. FMMFX (13.1B). FMMFX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: FMMFX (4.56) vs RGVBX (3.30). FMMFX was incepted earlier than RGVBX: FMMFX (6 years) vs RGVBX (24 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FMMFX (0.31). FMMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVBX (50.00). FMMFX (250) and RGVBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FMMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.22 vs. RGVBX (3.23). FMMFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.34 vs. RGVBX (-3.91).
| FMMFX | RGVBX | FMMFX / RGVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.32 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.32 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.022 | -0.655 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 24.3B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.56 | 3.30 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.22 | 3.23 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.47 | 7.60 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.34 | -3.91 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers