Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMMFX vs RGVCX
FMMFX vs RGVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVCX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. FMMFX (12.2B). FMMFX pays higher dividends than RGVCX: FMMFX (4.59) vs RGVCX (3.74). FMMFX was incepted earlier than RGVCX: FMMFX (5 years) vs RGVCX (23 years). RGVCX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMMFX (0.36). FMMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 824.00 vs. RGVCX (50.00). FMMFX (250) and RGVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FMMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. RGVCX (6.60). FMMFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.34 vs. RGVCX (-7.36).
| FMMFX | RGVCX | FMMFX / RGVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.93 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.588 | 6.538 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 23.8B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.59 | 3.74 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.82 | 6.60 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.98 | 10.37 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.34 | -7.36 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement