Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMMFX vs RGVCX
FMMFX vs RGVCX Comparison
Open Charts FMMFX vs RGVCX
FMMFX vs RGVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMMFX vs. RGVCX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMMFX is a Hold and RGVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVCX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. FMMFX (12.9B). FMMFX pays higher dividends than RGVCX: FMMFX (4.49) vs RGVCX (3.75). FMMFX was incepted earlier than RGVCX: FMMFX (6 years) vs RGVCX (24 years). RGVCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FMMFX (0.31). FMMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVCX (50.00). FMMFX (250) and RGVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FMMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.27 vs. RGVCX (-0.97). FMMFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.44 vs. RGVCX (-4.25).
| FMMFX | RGVCX | FMMFX / RGVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.231 | -1.847 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 24B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.49 | 3.75 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | -0.97 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.72 | 10.16 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.44 | -4.25 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers