Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMMMX vs RGACX
FMMMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMMMX vs RGACX
FMMMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMMMX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMMMX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FMMMX (94.5B). FMMMX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FMMMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMMMX (6 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMMMX (0.43). FMMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FMMMX (250) and RGACX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. FMMMX (-4.07). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. FMMMX (2.43).
| FMMMX | RGACX | FMMMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.93 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.93 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.206 | 8.819 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.5B | 353B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.07 | -0.53 | 767% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.81 | 40.68 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.43 | 10.82 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement