Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMMMX vs RGAHX
FMMMX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FMMMX vs RGAHX
FMMMX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMMMX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMMMX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FMMMX (94.5B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FMMMX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FMMMX (0.00). FMMMX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FMMMX (6 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). RGAHX (0.44) and FMMMX (0.43) have similar cost to investors . FMMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FMMMX (250) and RGAHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. FMMMX (-4.07). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. FMMMX (2.43).
| FMMMX | RGAHX | FMMMX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.44 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.44 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.206 | 9.200 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.5B | 353B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.07 | 0.18 | -2,268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.81 | 43.47 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.43 | 13.78 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement