Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMQSX vs RIRGX
FMQSX vs RIRGX Comparison
Open Charts FMQSX vs RIRGX
FMQSX vs RIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMQSX vs. RIRGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMQSX is a Buy and RIRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRGX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FMQSX (2.75B). FMQSX pays higher dividends than RIRGX: FMQSX (3.49) vs RIRGX (2.96). FMQSX was incepted earlier than RIRGX: FMQSX (17 years) vs RIRGX (17 years). FMQSX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RIRGX (0.26). FMQSX (50.37) and RIRGX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. RIRGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMQSX: RIRGX (250) vs FMQSX (1000). FMQSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.39 vs. RIRGX (7.96). FMQSX (41.25) and RIRGX (40.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FMQSX | RIRGX | FMQSX / RIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.26 | 496% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.26 | 496% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.499 | 9.892 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.75B | 131B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 2.96 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.39 | 7.96 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.63 | 45.79 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.25 | 40.97 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.95 | 73.27 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers