Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSDX vs RLBAX
FMSDX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FMSDX vs RLBAX
FMSDX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSDX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSDX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FMSDX (3.56B). FMSDX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FMSDX (3.73) vs RLBAX (1.11). FMSDX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FMSDX (8 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FMSDX (0.83). FMSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). FMSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FMSDX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX (10.43) and FMSDX (9.96) have marching annual gain over last year. FMSDX return over 5 years is better than : 31.18 vs. RLBAX (28.18).
| FMSDX | RLBAX | FMSDX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.32 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.32 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.150 | 7.908 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.56B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 1.11 | 336% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 10.43 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.70 | 35.45 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.18 | 28.18 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.40 | - |