Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSDX vs RLBCX
FMSDX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FMSDX vs RLBCX
FMSDX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSDX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSDX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FMSDX (3.56B). FMSDX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FMSDX (3.73) vs RLBCX (1.51). FMSDX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FMSDX (8 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FMSDX (0.83). FMSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBCX (50.00). FMSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FMSDX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.94 vs. FMSDX (9.96). FMSDX (31.18) and RLBCX (30.59) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FMSDX | RLBCX | FMSDX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.89 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.89 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.150 | 8.220 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.56B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 1.51 | 248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 10.94 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.70 | 37.30 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.18 | 30.59 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement