Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSDX vs RLBCX
FMSDX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FMSDX vs RLBCX
FMSDX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSDX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSDX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FMSDX (3.76B). FMSDX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FMSDX (3.68) vs RLBCX (1.52). FMSDX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FMSDX (8 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FMSDX (0.83). FMSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBCX (50.00). FMSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FMSDX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FMSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.83 vs. RLBCX (7.37). FMSDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.14 vs. RLBCX (30.44).
| FMSDX | RLBCX | FMSDX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.89 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.89 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.570 | 8.814 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.76B | 285B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.68 | 1.52 | 243% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.83 | 7.37 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.23 | 40.54 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.14 | 30.44 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement