Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSDX vs RLBEX
FMSDX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FMSDX vs RLBEX
FMSDX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSDX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSDX is a StrongBuy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FMSDX (3.56B). FMSDX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FMSDX (3.73) vs RLBEX (1.77). FMSDX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FMSDX (8 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FMSDX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). FMSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBEX (50.00). FMSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FMSDX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.52 vs. FMSDX (11.89). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.02 vs. FMSDX (32.23).
| FMSDX | RLBEX | FMSDX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.60 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.60 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.202 | 9.410 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.56B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 1.77 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 12.52 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.98 | 42.59 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.23 | 34.02 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers