Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSDX vs RLBEX
FMSDX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FMSDX vs RLBEX
FMSDX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSDX vs. RLBEX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSDX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FMSDX (3.56B). FMSDX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FMSDX (3.73) vs RLBEX (1.77). FMSDX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FMSDX (8 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FMSDX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). FMSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBEX (50.00). FMSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FMSDX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. FMSDX (9.96). RLBEX (32.29) and FMSDX (31.18) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FMSDX | RLBEX | FMSDX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.60 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.60 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.150 | 8.389 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.56B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 1.77 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 11.29 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.70 | 38.57 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.18 | 32.29 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.73 | - |