Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSDX vs RLBEX
FMSDX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FMSDX vs RLBEX
FMSDX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSDX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSDX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FMSDX (3.76B). FMSDX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FMSDX (3.68) vs RLBEX (1.77). FMSDX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FMSDX (8 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FMSDX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). FMSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBEX (50.00). FMSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FMSDX (0) vs RLBEX (250). FMSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.83 vs. RLBEX (7.72). FMSDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.14 vs. RLBEX (32.11).
| FMSDX | RLBEX | FMSDX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.60 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.60 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.570 | 9.034 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.76B | 285B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.68 | 1.77 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.83 | 7.72 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.23 | 41.87 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.14 | 32.11 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers