Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSGX vs NPFFX
FMSGX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts FMSGX vs NPFFX
FMSGX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSGX vs. NPFFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSGX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FMSGX (14.9M). NPFFX (0.94) and FMSGX (0.93) have matching dividends . FMSGX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: FMSGX (7 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). FMSGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). FMSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. NPFFX (23.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMSGX: NPFFX (250) vs FMSGX (1000000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. FMSGX (3.15). FMSGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.50 vs. NPFFX (12.18).
| FMSGX | NPFFX | FMSGX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.77 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.77 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.776 | 4.901 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.9M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.94 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.15 | 6.67 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.40 | 33.53 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.50 | 12.18 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers