Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSGX vs NPFFX
FMSGX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts FMSGX vs NPFFX
FMSGX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSGX vs. NPFFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSGX is a Buy and NPFFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FMSGX (14.6M). NPFFX (0.92) and FMSGX (0.91) have matching dividends . FMSGX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: FMSGX (7 years) vs NPFFX (26 years). FMSGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). FMSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. NPFFX (23.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMSGX: NPFFX (250) vs FMSGX (1000000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.93 vs. FMSGX (-7.52). FMSGX return over 5 years is better than : 25.93 vs. NPFFX (10.57).
| FMSGX | NPFFX | FMSGX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.77 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.77 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.109 | 6.544 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.6M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.92 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.52 | 3.93 | -191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 39.74 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.93 | 10.57 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement