Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSGX vs RNPCX
FMSGX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts FMSGX vs RNPCX
FMSGX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSGX vs. RNPCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSGX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FMSGX (14.9M). FMSGX pays higher dividends than RNPCX: FMSGX (0.93) vs RNPCX (0.71). FMSGX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: FMSGX (7 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). FMSGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.05). FMSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNPCX (23.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMSGX: RNPCX (250) vs FMSGX (1000000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. FMSGX (3.15). FMSGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.50 vs. RNPCX (10.33).
| FMSGX | RNPCX | FMSGX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.05 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.05 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.776 | 4.726 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.9M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.71 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.15 | 6.23 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.40 | 31.95 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.50 | 10.33 | 344% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers