Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSGX vs RNPCX
FMSGX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts FMSGX vs RNPCX
FMSGX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSGX vs. RNPCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSGX is a Buy and RNPCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FMSGX (14.6M). FMSGX pays higher dividends than RNPCX: FMSGX (0.91) vs RNPCX (0.70). FMSGX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: FMSGX (7 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). FMSGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.05). FMSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNPCX (23.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMSGX: RNPCX (250) vs FMSGX (1000000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.49 vs. FMSGX (-7.52). FMSGX return over 5 years is better than : 25.93 vs. RNPCX (8.76).
| FMSGX | RNPCX | FMSGX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.05 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.05 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.109 | 6.341 | -49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.6M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.70 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.52 | 3.49 | -215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 38.08 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.93 | 8.76 | 296% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement