Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSTX vs RMEBX
FMSTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FMSTX vs RMEBX
FMSTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSTX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FMSTX (2.65B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FMSTX: RMEBX (1.04) vs FMSTX (0.80). FMSTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FMSTX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FMSTX (0.89). FMSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMSTX: RMEBX (250) vs FMSTX (1000000). FMSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.66 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. FMSTX (22.28).
| FMSTX | RMEBX | FMSTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.025 | 6.308 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.04 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.66 | 9.11 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.59 | 34.37 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.28 | 34.74 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.23 | 94.33 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement