Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMTFX vs FRORX
FMTFX vs FRORX Comparison
Open Charts FMTFX vs FRORX
FMTFX vs FRORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMTFX vs. FRORX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMTFX is a Hold and FRORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRORX has more cash in the bank: 817M vs. FMTFX (672M). FRORX (3.51) and FMTFX (3.44) have matching dividends . FMTFX was incepted earlier than FRORX: FMTFX (18 years) vs FRORX (39 years). FRORX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FMTFX (0.58). FRORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.43 vs. FMTFX (14.13). FRORX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMTFX: FRORX (1000) vs FMTFX (100000). FRORX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. FMTFX (6.79). FMTFX (-0.25) and FRORX (-0.26) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FMTFX | FRORX | FMTFX / FRORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.66 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.66 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.242 | 2.286 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 672M | 817M | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 3.51 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.79 | 7.30 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.64 | 11.64 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.25 | -0.26 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.55 | 1.95 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement