Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMTFX vs MSNCX
FMTFX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FMTFX vs MSNCX
FMTFX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMTFX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMTFX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMTFX has more cash in the bank: 672M vs. MSNCX (578M). FMTFX (3.44) and MSNCX (3.29) have matching dividends . FMTFX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FMTFX (18 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FMTFX (0.58). FMTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.13 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMTFX: MSNCX (1000) vs FMTFX (100000). MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. FMTFX (6.79). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. FMTFX (-0.25).
| FMTFX | MSNCX | FMTFX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.84 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.86 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.242 | 2.595 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 672M | 578M | 116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 3.29 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.79 | 7.54 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.64 | 12.01 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.25 | 3.55 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.55 | 14.93 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement