Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUAX vs HBLSX
FMUAX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FMUAX vs HBLSX
FMUAX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUAX vs. HBLSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUAX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FMUAX (1.43B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FMUAX: HBLSX (3.02) vs FMUAX (1.85). FMUAX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FMUAX (23 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). FMUAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FMUAX (31.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUAX: HBLSX (0) vs FMUAX (1500). FMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.92 vs. HBLSX (1.12). FMUAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.15 vs. HBLSX (4.26).
| FMUAX | HBLSX | FMUAX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.96 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.96 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.751 | 3.987 | 144% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 10.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 3.02 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.92 | 1.12 | 800% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.25 | 19.56 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.15 | 4.26 | 543% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.96 | 38.33 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement