Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUAX vs HBLSX
FMUAX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FMUAX vs HBLSX
FMUAX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUAX vs. HBLSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUAX is a Buy and HBLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FMUAX (1.46B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FMUAX: HBLSX (3.07) vs FMUAX (1.74). FMUAX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FMUAX (23 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). FMUAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FMUAX (31.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUAX: HBLSX (0) vs FMUAX (1500). FMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.97 vs. HBLSX (4.95). FMUAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.93 vs. HBLSX (5.80).
| FMUAX | HBLSX | FMUAX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.96 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.96 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.186 | 4.264 | 169% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 11.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 3.07 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.97 | 4.95 | 302% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.44 | 18.51 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.93 | 5.80 | 429% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.11 | 37.42 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement