Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUAX vs HBLYX
FMUAX vs HBLYX Comparison
Open Charts FMUAX vs HBLYX
FMUAX vs HBLYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUAX vs. HBLYX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUAX is a Buy and HBLYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLYX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FMUAX (1.43B). HBLYX pays higher dividends than FMUAX: HBLYX (3.27) vs FMUAX (1.85). FMUAX was incepted earlier than HBLYX: FMUAX (23 years) vs HBLYX (20 years). FMUAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than HBLYX (0.67). HBLYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FMUAX (31.00). FMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLYX: FMUAX (1500) vs HBLYX (250000). FMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.92 vs. HBLYX (1.47). FMUAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.15 vs. HBLYX (5.98).
| FMUAX | HBLYX | FMUAX / HBLYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.67 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.67 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.751 | 4.252 | 135% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 10.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 3.27 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.92 | 1.47 | 606% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.25 | 20.75 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.15 | 5.98 | 387% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.96 | 42.45 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement