Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUCX vs HBLAX
FMUCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FMUCX vs HBLAX
FMUCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUCX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FMUCX (1.43B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FMUCX: HBLAX (3.13) vs FMUCX (1.13). FMUCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FMUCX (23 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). FMUCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FMUCX (31.00). FMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FMUCX (1500) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FMUCX: HBLAX (2000) vs FMUCX (250). FMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. HBLAX (1.22). FMUCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.62 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| FMUCX | HBLAX | FMUCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.89 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.89 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.161 | 4.076 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2000 | 75% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 10.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 3.13 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.12 | 1.22 | 666% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.31 | 19.75 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.62 | 4.63 | 402% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.67 | 39.00 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement