Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUCX vs HBLAX
FMUCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FMUCX vs HBLAX
FMUCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUCX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FMUCX (1.46B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FMUCX: HBLAX (3.19) vs FMUCX (1.01). FMUCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FMUCX (23 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). FMUCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FMUCX (31.00). FMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FMUCX (1500) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FMUCX: HBLAX (2000) vs FMUCX (250). FMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.17 vs. HBLAX (6.67). FMUCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.83 vs. HBLAX (5.54).
| FMUCX | HBLAX | FMUCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.89 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.89 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.398 | 3.324 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2000 | 75% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 11.2B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 3.19 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.17 | 6.67 | 242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.18 | 20.39 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.83 | 5.54 | 340% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.20 | 41.10 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers