Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUCX vs HBLSX
FMUCX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FMUCX vs HBLSX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv C
Price$14.55
Change+$0.05 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.62
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
FMUCX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUCX vs. HBLSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUCX is a Buy and HBLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. FMUCX (1.32B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FMUCX: HBLSX (3.26) vs FMUCX (1.37). FMUCX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FMUCX (22 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). FMUCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMUCX (23.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUCX: HBLSX (0) vs FMUCX (1500). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.47 vs. FMUCX (2.63). FMUCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.12 vs. HBLSX (11.71).
| FMUCX | HBLSX | FMUCX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.96 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.96 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.123 | 3.251 | -35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 11.7B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 3.26 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | 3.47 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.04 | 7.22 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.12 | 11.71 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.14 | 35.82 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers