Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUCX vs HBLSX
FMUCX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FMUCX vs HBLSX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv C
Price$15.48
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.21
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.96B
FMUCX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUCX vs. HBLSX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUCX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. FMUCX (1.39B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FMUCX: HBLSX (3.17) vs FMUCX (1.30). FMUCX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FMUCX (22 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). FMUCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMUCX (23.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUCX: HBLSX (0) vs FMUCX (1500). FMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.07 vs. HBLSX (2.41). FMUCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.75 vs. HBLSX (15.94).
| FMUCX | HBLSX | FMUCX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.96 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.96 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.849 | 8.520 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 12B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 3.17 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.07 | 2.41 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.33 | 18.96 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.75 | 15.94 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.86 | 47.45 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement