Ad is loading...
FMUCX vs HBLSX
FMUCX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FMUCX vs HBLSX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv C
Price$14.09
Change+$0.12 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.30
Change+$0.12 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
FMUCX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUCX vs. HBLSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUCX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. FMUCX (1.29B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FMUCX: HBLSX (3.26) vs FMUCX (1.36). FMUCX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FMUCX (22 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). FMUCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMUCX (23.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUCX: HBLSX (0) vs FMUCX (1500). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. FMUCX (0.51). FMUCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.89 vs. HBLSX (15.97).
| FMUCX | HBLSX | FMUCX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.96 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.96 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.838 | 0.281 | -1,723% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 11.5B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 3.26 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.51 | 3.11 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.12 | 4.27 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.89 | 15.97 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.13 | 28.95 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers