Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUCX vs HBLSX
FMUCX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FMUCX vs HBLSX
FMUCX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUCX vs. HBLSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUCX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FMUCX (1.43B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FMUCX: HBLSX (3.02) vs FMUCX (1.13). FMUCX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FMUCX (23 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). FMUCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FMUCX (31.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUCX: HBLSX (0) vs FMUCX (1500). FMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. HBLSX (1.12). FMUCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.62 vs. HBLSX (4.26).
| FMUCX | HBLSX | FMUCX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.96 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.96 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.161 | 3.987 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 10.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 3.02 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.12 | 1.12 | 727% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.31 | 19.56 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.62 | 4.26 | 437% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.67 | 38.33 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers