Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUFX vs HBLSX
FMUFX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FMUFX vs HBLSX
FMUFX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUFX vs. HBLSX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUFX is a Hold and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. FMUFX (1.46B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FMUFX: HBLSX (3.08) vs FMUFX (1.72). FMUFX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FMUFX (19 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). FMUFX (1.09) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FMUFX (31.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUFX: HBLSX (0) vs FMUFX (1500). FMUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.00 vs. HBLSX (6.78). FMUFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.05 vs. HBLSX (7.59).
| FMUFX | HBLSX | FMUFX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.96 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.96 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.424 | 4.365 | 147% |
| Front Load | 1% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 11.3B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 3.08 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.00 | 6.78 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.32 | 19.66 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.05 | 7.59 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.89 | 42.37 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement