Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUIX vs HBLSX
FMUIX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FMUIX vs HBLSX
FMUIX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUIX vs. HBLSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUIX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FMUIX (1.43B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FMUIX: HBLSX (3.02) vs FMUIX (2.09). FMUIX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FMUIX (16 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FMUIX (0.84). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FMUIX (31.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUIX: HBLSX (0) vs FMUIX (1000000). FMUIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. HBLSX (1.12). FMUIX return over 5 years is better than : 24.63 vs. HBLSX (4.26).
| FMUIX | HBLSX | FMUIX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.96 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.96 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.864 | 3.987 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 10.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 3.02 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | 1.12 | 818% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.27 | 19.56 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.63 | 4.26 | 578% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.06 | 38.33 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers