Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUIX vs HBLSX
FMUIX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FMUIX vs HBLSX
FMUIX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUIX vs. HBLSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUIX is a Hold and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FMUIX (1.44B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FMUIX: HBLSX (3.04) vs FMUIX (2.04). FMUIX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FMUIX (16 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FMUIX (0.84). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FMUIX (31.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUIX: HBLSX (0) vs FMUIX (1000000). FMUIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.04 vs. HBLSX (5.37). FMUIX return over 5 years is better than : 25.43 vs. HBLSX (5.46).
| FMUIX | HBLSX | FMUIX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.96 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.96 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.543 | 4.611 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 11.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 3.04 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.04 | 5.37 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.55 | 17.89 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.43 | 5.46 | 466% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.83 | 38.76 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers