Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUIX vs HBLSX
FMUIX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FMUIX vs HBLSX
FMUIX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUIX vs. HBLSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUIX is a StrongBuy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FMUIX (1.46B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FMUIX: HBLSX (3.08) vs FMUIX (1.96). FMUIX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FMUIX (15 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FMUIX (0.84). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FMUIX (31.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUIX: HBLSX (0) vs FMUIX (1000000). FMUIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.55 vs. HBLSX (5.86). FMUIX return over 5 years is better than : 26.85 vs. HBLSX (6.36).
| FMUIX | HBLSX | FMUIX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.96 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.96 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.810 | 3.608 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 11.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 3.08 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.55 | 5.86 | 299% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.32 | 20.07 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.85 | 6.36 | 423% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.95 | 41.96 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement