Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMURX vs TRIGX
FMURX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts FMURX vs TRIGX
Franklin Mutual International Value R
Price$28.90
Change-$0.06 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.92
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.98B
FMURX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMURX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMURX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. FMURX (1.12B). FMURX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: FMURX (2.36) vs TRIGX (2.04). FMURX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: FMURX (16 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). FMURX (1.49) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). FMURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.06 vs. TRIGX (15.90). FMURX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: FMURX (1000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.40 vs. FMURX (22.92). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.97 vs. FMURX (89.77).
| FMURX | TRIGX | FMURX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.87 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.87 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.425 | 29.017 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 16B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 2.04 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.92 | 27.40 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.27 | 76.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.77 | 99.97 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.98 | 79.09 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement