Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMURX vs TRIGX
FMURX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts FMURX vs TRIGX
FMURX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMURX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMURX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. FMURX (1.21B). FMURX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: FMURX (2.95) vs TRIGX (2.38). FMURX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: FMURX (17 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). FMURX (1.51) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). FMURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.25 vs. TRIGX (15.00). FMURX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: FMURX (1000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.85 vs. FMURX (17.73). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 89.13 vs. FMURX (67.88).
| FMURX | TRIGX | FMURX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.81 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.81 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.056 | 11.775 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 16.9B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 2.38 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.73 | 31.85 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.06 | 88.48 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.88 | 89.13 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.74 | 167.74 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement